"The Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth"

A veteran participant in The Internet Writing Workshop recently post a link to an article on Slate about the renowned author David Sedaris.

Jack Shafer wrote in Slate, "When Alex Heard tenderly busted David Sedaris in the New Republic last month for adulterating his nonfiction with many imagined settings, scenes, and dialogue, I expected journalists and others to rebuke the best-selling humorist."

There's a list on the IWW that discusses creative nonfiction, which is Sedaris' genre. We discuss the issue of truth on a regular basis, it seems. One of the active members of the Creative Nonfiction Discussion list, Ruth Douillette, who writes about people for her local newspaper, has even presented her take on the matter here on the IWW Blog.

Personally, I don't believe in absolute factual truth, but I believe in Truth as an ideal, as a spiritual concept. That's a fancy way, I suppose, of saying find it easier to rely on a Rashomon point of view of the world than to charge ahead attempting to sort elements of this place we live into a perfect little slots of right or wrong, black or white, yes or no, true or false.

And I won't even mention quantum theory.

I write creative nonfiction. I use dialog within the essays I write and publish, but the words I place inside quotation marks are not verbatim text from recorded conversations. The words are recollections. And I think that's fair.

But, if my memoir is published, Oprah won't call me on the carpet and carve me into A Million Little Pieces as she did James Frey. I'm relying on memory, not fabrication.

Which Sedaris apparently has on occasion, although he prefers the word exaggeration to fabrication.

If you like creative nonfiction -- and find yourself musing over the seemingly never-ending controversy about truth and fiction the genre inspires -- you'll find some interesting reading in the Slate article, and in the links within the article.

Truth in Journalism

By Ruth Douillette, an IWW adminstrator

What is Truth?

Okay, we won't go there again. Can we even agree that there is an absolute truth? There must be, but I'm not sure.

Is truth in the eye of the beholder? Do you see a different truth than others? Or is that just believing your opinion is true?

Truth is sometimes embellished, and s-t-r-e-t-c-h-e-d. Once stretched it has left an impression of "truth" that never snaps back to absolute--if there even is such a thing. Sometimes truth rearranged, or expressed out of order, alters its absolute truthfulness. Truths omitted among truths stated also reframe absolute truth.

I had none of these questions when I plunged blindly into the world of journalism. Maybe I should make that "small town" of journalism, to be more truthful.

The point is, when I became a stringer for a local newspaper, I was armed only with the ability to tie words together, an aptness for weeding through details to cull the essence of a long meeting, and a desire to "do no harm" to my town by remaining unbiased--writing the truth, in other words.

A local issue involved an alleged verbal threat accompanied by nasty language made by a town official (John*) to a 70-year-old woman (Mary) who is known to be quite snappish herself. Mary took John to court, and after ten months the case was "continued without a finding." Just as the dust was settling, another town official (Brumhilda), prone to shaking her broom, stirred up a cloud again when she accused the official of lying.

John was guilty, she said.

I am not, he said.

John is on probation, she said

I am not, he said.

Find out the truth, my editor said.

Can't we just let this settle down again, I asked?

No, we couldn't. A newspaper has an obligation to present the truth, he said.

I went to a reliable source, the chief probation officer of the court. In a phone conversation I asked the meaning of the legalese, rephrased questions and asked again, clarified, wrote her answers and read them back to her. Then I wrote my story.

With the headline "Court Explains John's Probationary Status," and a bold sideline quote from the Chief Probation Officer saying, "Neither John or Mary is wrong in what they say, but neither is 100 percent right," I thought the entire article was walking the middle of the road.

Then Brumhilda shook her broom and the dust hit the fan. She called the paper and tried to get me fired for not telling the truth.

Doing no harm apparently is not possible, however good the intentions. I stirred up a bit of a hornet's nest, albeit a tiny one that stopped buzzing very quickly, to be truthful again. But it startled me. And got me asking questions greater minds than mine have pondered for centuries. What is truth, anyway? Or put another way, whose truth is the right truth?

*Names have been changed to hide the truth.

~~~~~~~

For a more comprehensive discussion on truth in journalism, see Glenn Greenwald's story "National journalists believe you should trust them" in the April 5th Salon.

-------------------------

Ruth Douillette, co-administrator of IWW Practice, is a middle-school teacher.  She writes
profiles, features, and news for her town paper, and appears as a regular guest on "Around
the Table," a local cable talk show. For the truth about Ruth visit her blog.