Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts

Sunday, November 25, 2012

This Week's Practice Exercise



Prepared by: Don Mackenzie

Posted on: Sunday, 25 November 2012

--------------

Exercise: In 400 words or less, show us a character whose imagination has a particularly significant effect, either within the story or on the reader.

--------------

Dreaming or imagining is a natural function of ordinary and creative life. A person may be trying to take him or herself out of an uncomfortable situation, or imagining the steps she or he needs to take to achieve a victory.

Dreaming/imagining can also be an activity that sneaks up on a character. It may undermine intentions or point the way to new success.

Dreaming/imagining is a powerful force that writers should be encouraged to explore, but caution is needed. The revelation "it was all a dream" is one of the most offensive devices in fiction. Readers object when they feel they have been tricked and the contract between writer and reader has been broken. Surprises are wonderful, but the reader must feel properly prepared and the surprise must be appropriate.

"All men dream, but not equally. Those who dream by night in the dusty recesses of their minds wake in the day to find that it was vanity: but the dreamers of the day are dangerous men, for they may act their dream with open eyes, to make it possible."--T. E. Lawrence, "Seven Pillars of Wisdom"

------------

Exercise: In 400 words or less, show us a character whose imagination has a particularly significant effect, either within the story or on the reader.

-------------

When critiquing, explain whether you found it easy or difficult to  draw the line between what was real and what was imagined. Did you find the writing believable or insightful? Are the characters and the setting well drawn?




These exercises were written by IWW members and administrators to provide structured practice opportunities for its members. You are welcome to use them for practice as well. Please mention that you found them at the Internet Writing Workshop.

Sunday, November 4, 2012

This Week's Practice Exercise



Prepared by: Alice Folkart
Posted on: Sunday, May 30, 2010
Reposted on: Sunday, November 3, 2012

-----------------------

In 400 words or less write a scene from an animal's point of view, have the animal want something from either a human or another animal.

-----------------------

Is a dog waiting and waiting for his walk? Is a cat plotting to catch and eat the canary? Is a deer being hunted? What does the fish, swimming back and forth in his little aquarium, think of what he sees? The hamster--where does he think is he going in his running wheel? Perhaps the thoughts of a pet in a carrier on the way to the vet or going on a trip . Is this the voice of an old animal, tired, ready to die? What about the pampered 'accessory' dog who goes everywhere in his mistress's purse? Tame or wild, your choice.
-----------------------

In 400 words or less write a scene from an animal's point of view, have the animal want something from either a human or another animal.

-----------------------

In your critique consider whether the writer has given us a believable animal 'voice.' Is the fictional animal wiser and wilier than humans, or simpler? Does the animal's view of other animals or humans give us insights that we might not otherwise have had? If the piece is successful, tell us why. If it could be better, tell us how.




These exercises were written by IWW members and administrators to provide structured practice opportunities for its members. You are welcome to use them for practice as well. Please mention that you found them at the Internet Writing Workshop.

Sunday, March 15, 2009

This Week's Practice Exercise~

Prepared by: Prepared by: Alice Folkart
Reposted revised on: Sunday, 15 March 2009



Exercise: In less than 500 words, write a dialogue twice: first just the words, as if overheard, and then with description/action added as if you're watching the two people talking.
-------------------------
This is a two-part exercise, but with a total word count of 500 words. First write a two-person dialogue of 100 words or so, and then write the same dialog as a full-blown scene of approximately 400 words incorporating description/action.

The bare-bones dialogue should be something one might overhear when unable to see the speakers. This part of the exercise should be quite short, 100 to 150 words. Then, revise, adding description and/or action. The word count of the "revised" dialogue should bring the total word count of the two parts up to no more than 500 words.

Your submission will consist of the two parts together, and should total no more than 500 words.
---------------------------
These exercises were written by IWW members and administrators to provide structured practice opportunities for its members. You are welcome to use them for practice as well. Please mention that you found them at the Internet Writers Workshop

Thursday, August 21, 2008

"Not in My Back Yard!" "Or Is It Not in My Backyard?"


Things That Matter Enough
by Carter Jefferson

Having lived a fairly long time, I am pretty used to the language shifting under my feet, and I don't get usually get as mad as Lynn Truss does when I see something weird in print. But not too many years ago some idiot start spelling "back yard" as one word -- "backyard." It has caught on, and now I see it everywhere. It even made first place in the AHD4.

"Front yard" hasn't suffered that indignity -- the space is still there in AHD4 and nearly everywhere else. Gross discrimination, I say.

Everybody should know, but some don't, that what's in the dictionary is not what words ought to be, but what enough people say or write -- including illiterates, thoughtless types, and people even you wouldn't like.

Think of the way this sounds: "The swings are in the back yard." Note that when you speak there's the tiny pause between "back" and "yard." Of course, you might say "It's a backyard swing," without that pause and it would sound just right. But a "back seat driver" still takes the pause, so all compound adjectives don't follow the same pronunciation rules.

Of course, all those people in Weston, Massachusetts, who stopped the bike trail from coming through can't say "Nimby" anymore; they have to say "Nimb," right?

Last night, however, I learned to my immense joy that the New Yorker, which is pretty careful about words, still spells "back yard" the way it ought to be spelled. It's at the end of the third paragraph of an article in the financial section of the Aug. 11 & 18 issue called "The Permission Problem."

Of course, it may be a typo, and some proofreader is in big trouble. But maybe not. Just for now, I'm going to believe they meant to spell it that way. You could, too, and then we'd take back that lost ground, swing and all.

You think these things don't matter enough to comment on? Fine. You're not me.

Friday, November 30, 2007

The Ten Best Books of 2007


... according to the New York Times

Saturday, August 25, 2007

How I Found the IWW

  • I heard about the IWW in the forward to the new Diane Diekman book on Faron Young. Several months back, as I started my research on Bud Isaacs, I e-mailed Ms. Diekman for advice. Not knowing me from anyone off the streets, she was extremely helpful, knowledgeable and encouraging. When I saw the mention in the foreword of the book, I decided to check it out based on the great experience I have had corresponding with her.
  • I learned about your site from Max Barry, an Australian writer published in the US, who is a member of your site. I've been looking for a operating writing workshop for some time and I'm glad to find a site that's organised with rules for membership etc.
  • I found this group through google looking for people to help me fix my little editing problem, I think this may be the key to whether or not I should keep this up!
  • I found this group because even though I have not talked to Mona Vanek since I was a child -- I have read some of her writing on the Internet. Mona spoke very highly of this group. So I came to the site and decided to join too.
  • Just a line to let you know that I found the link to your site at forwriters.com.
  • Thank you for the membership and opportunities.
  • I found this page via Yahoo search.

Saturday, August 18, 2007

How I Found the IWW

The Internet Writing Workshop continues to attract new members, thanks mostly to desire plus impulse followed by a trip to the world's most reliable search engine, the one named for the number one followed by a hundred zeros, or the illustration of "the difference between an unimaginably large number and infinity."

New members and old should remember to promote this creative cooperative known as The Internet Writing Workshop. We who voluntarily administer the IWW appreciate every individual who links to the workshop or to this blog. And, if you like, we can forward an IWW logo for your to display.

  • I found your site when I did a Google search for online writer's groups.
  • My cousin told me about The Internet Writing Workshop.
  • I found IWW as a Google search: 'free novel critiques' or some such.
  • Yahoo search.
  • There's a woman, Sussana I believe, whose real-life writing group I joined. She told me to sign up, so I'm here.
  • Where I heard: I've run across references to IWW in several other places, mostly online. I can't recall the exact sites (other than Google searches).
  • I don't remember how I found you. Sorry!
  • I found your site through a google search.

Wednesday, August 15, 2007

Makin' It All Up

I enjoy reading creative nonfiction, although I concentrate more on essays than longer works.

Nevertheless, I enjoyed A Perfect Storm, which generally is perceived as creative nonfiction. I also recently re-read another book which probably is classified in the same genre -- Into Thin Air, the story of the deadly Mount Everest expedition of 1996. In fact, I've written a review for a new book Web site that will be active soon.

I don't remember much controversy regarding Into Thin Air, at least inspired by the truthiness of the writing. The author, Krakauer, was on the mountain. He was part of one of the expeditions. He had the opportunity to take notes, to write down impressions, to observe and report.

I recall, though, that The Perfect Storm inspired questions of "How could he know that?" especially as the book covered events aboard the fishing vessel Andrea Gale, which went down in the storm.

Of course, any memoir -- any piece of creative nonfiction -- which relies on memory can be questioned. Unless we move through life with a voice recorder, we cannot recollect conversations verbatim. Nevertheless, there are few memoirs that appear without dialog. Dialog remember. Dialog reconstructed. Dialog processed by post-conversation experience.

However, you rarely run across a book review or a commentary that confronts an author about supposed incidents of truthiness. That's what struck me about "Ladies of the Evening" by Ada Calhoun, a review of SIN IN THE SECOND CITY: Madams, Ministers, Playboys, and the Battle for America’s Soul by Karen Abbott, and published recently by Random House.

Calhoun, though, never shouts Liar, liar, pants on fire! Instead we have "Like Luc Sante’s Low Life, Sin in the Second City is a lush love letter to the underworld. It’s so poetic that at times one wonders how much liberty Abbott took fleshing out the facts of scenes like this: Behind her now, talking her ear off in between indulgent swallows of Champagne, was one Vernon Shaw Kennedy.

"An endnote places Kennedy at the club that night but fails to confirm that he wasn’t in front of his companion, that he wasn’t taciturn that evening or that he wasn’t primly sipping bourbon. Still, everything feels plausible."

What does it all mean? I suppose nothing more than you cannot lie outright -- see the James Frey saga -- but that if you can write "in such detail that it’s easy to mistake this meticulously researched history for literary fiction," you may get a good review without being scolded on Oprah.

Sunday, August 12, 2007

This Week's IWW Practice Exercise

Exercise: Overheard (Version 2)
Prepared by: Ruth Douillette
Posted May 28, 2006
Reposted, revised on August 12, 2007
_____________________

Exercise: In 300 words or less, write a scene using the dialogue that is
provided so we understand the characters, where they are and why
the conversation is taking place.
_____________________
Writers are always on the lookout for good story ideas. An
overheard conversation often produces a spark upon which a
plot can be built. Perhaps it's the cell phone conversation in
the grocery store that provides fodder for a mystery plot.

This exercise focuses on dialogue enhancement. Read the
snippet of dialogue below and imagine a setting in which this
conversation might take place, and the characters who might
speak these lines. Write a scene around the given dialogue so
that we understand the characters, where they are and why the
conversation is taking place.

Your "enhancement" might make the conversation humorous,
angry, heartbreaking, or just an ordinary dinner table chat.
Through your addition of narrative and dialogue tags, the
reader should be able to clearly see two characters in a
particular setting having this particular conversation. Here are
the lines you overheard:

"I can't believe you just said that."

"Why? What's wrong with that?"

"You're kidding me, right?"

"Hey, it's the truth. I call it like I see it."

"But, under the circumstances . . . "

This dialogue is a framework; feel free to use it creatively.
_____________________

Thursday, August 9, 2007

Metaphor, Imagined Worlds, and Writing

My good friend Shayla Mollohan, poet-presider over the IWW's Poetry list, sent me a link opening a window on the magical world of one Mr. Potter, known as Harry to his friends.

A confession: I have read only one or two pages of the first tome in the Harry Potter saga. I don't get it.

Here's the paragraph offering an insight to what I -- and other well-meaning readers like me -- might be unable to acknowledge.

" ... there is a certain kind of fantasy story that seems to be able to reach beyond the edges of the normal fandom. It seems to be able to cross the boundaries and appeal so strongly to people that they sometimes don't even notice that they're enjoying fantasy ... The people who don't like Harry Potter seem to be the ones who haven't tried it yet. It's universally appealing, like pie and Anderson Cooper. That means, of course, that Harry has something to teach those of us who want to write, create, air or sell sci-fi/fantasy television shows."
That I don't like Harry Potter is no reflection on anyone but me or anything but my taste in writing.

The article is from The New Republic, and it's available on-line.


A wise person will also take the time to read one of Shaye's poems -- Enough -- while at the computer. Click here to find on her Web site as reprinted from Whatever Remembers Us: An Anthology of Alabama Poets, Negative Capability Press, 2007.

Tuesday, July 31, 2007

Color Me Green with ...

  • a feeling of grudging admiration and desire to have something that is possessed by another
  • feel envious towards; admire enviously
  • spite and resentment at seeing the success of another (personified as one of the deadly sins)
  • be envious of; set one's heart on

Envy is universal. The Germans say "Envy eats nothing but its own heart," and the English offer "Envy shoots at others and wounds itself."

And where you find success, you find envy -- yin and yang, white and black.
"If you want to get rich from writing, Don Marquis once suggested, write the sort of thing that’s read by persons who move their lips when they’re reading to themselves. Marquis had rock-steady sights and, once, this remark would have thudded home clean and true. But no longer. If we have learned anything from JK Rowling, Britain’s most celebrated typist, it is that if you want to get rich from writing, write the sort of thing that ends up as a plastic action-figure buried deep inside a Happy Meal."
The complete attack, one carried out by a writer named Tom Eaton, can be found on-line, apparently in a newspaper originating in South Africa.

I was amused, primarily because it illustrates the consequences of disobeying one of the admonitions offered during my childhood. "If you can't say anything nice, don't say anything." I envisaged the fellow being drowned in irate emails from Potterites. Being off-shore, I assume, he need not worry, though, about that peculiar American propensity to nose-punch when the chip is knocked from a shoulder. See the "Nerd who burned the trailer" story.

I sent the link to the story to two writer friends I greatly respect, suggesting it might provide fodder for an article or a blog post.

One replied, "The only thing palatable anyone could possibly write about this twaddle would have to be funny. It's too stupid to be taken seriously ... "

Hmm, that's so. I believe it's extraordinarily ignorant to take on a publishing elephant (millions of copies in circulation) with a fly-swatter (a column). Eaton accomplishes nothing other than to reveal some of his lesser qualities.

Given the Warholian concept of "15 Minutes of Fame," I suppose attacking JK Rowling and Harry Potter is a simple, straight-forward way to become noticed, although slightly more boorish or peu sophistiqué than simply showing up on a red carpet in a short skirt and a pout.


"Even those who write against fame wish for the fame of having written well ... " Pascal.

Tuesday, July 17, 2007

Selling Books, Editing Books

One of the Internet Writing Workshop's long-time members -- and newest administrators -- Bob Sanchez is the author of When Pigs Fly, a comic novel.

Bob published his novel through iUniverse, a choice that leaves the marketing of his novel in his hands primarily. Recently, he made a post on the IWW's WRITING list about his latest effort to get his work out there.

Last fall, a friend asked me to proofread his novel, and he would pay me a fee. Already familiar with his writing, I knew it would be a lot of work. I quoted him an amount that was more than he was willing to pay, and he reluctantly passed.

Then an idea came to me, and I proposed a deal. I would give his novel a thorough line edit and charge him nothing. He, in turn, would purchase copies of my new novel, When Pigs Fly, as Christmas gifts for friends and family. The quantity he bought would depend on the value he placed on my work, on what he could afford, and the number of people on his Christmas list.

My friend was delighted. He not only got a desperately needed edit but took care of his holiday shopping as well, purchasing 25 copies from Amazon.

Since then, another friend asked me to edit his novel as well (these fellows are both in my local writer's group). At this point he has my edits, and shortly I'll expect him to purchase a quantity of my books. Again, the number is up to him. He'll be on his honor to pay me fairly -- buying just a couple of copies won't cut it -- but on the other hand I won't make a huge issue in the unlikely case he stiffs me.

Anyway, this has me thinking that bartering edits for book sales may not be a bad marketing tool, given that I have the necessary skill set technical editor) and experience. But there may be others on this list with circumstances similar to mine: you have a book published by a small press, you have strong editing skills, and you want to boost your sales. Edits for books may be worth a try.

Whenever someone treks off the beaten path, there's another someone eager to yell, "Hey, watch it!"

The reaction to Bob's post was generally supportive, but mixed. As much as I found Bob's idea novel and innovative, I found his response to the nay-sayers worthwhile.

  1. If I needed to make money, I would have to be a blooming idiot to try earning it by peddling my book. I am an optimist, but not a fool. If the stars align properly, I might make back my investment someday. More likely, I will wind up defraying most of my expenses, and that's okay with me.
  2. I want people to read my book. I much prefer that they pay me, not because I need grocery money, but because it makes me feel good to know that someone will pay real money for something I created.
  3. I've heard that very few self-published books (by which here I mean POD through iUniverse) ever sell 500 or more copies. Call me a dreamer, but that's what I want to do because someone has said I can't.
  4. Editing for me is both work and fun. There is a certain pleasure to be had in pointing out the errors in other people's work, you know. It may not swell my wallet, but it swells my head.
  5. Every book I sell is the result of hard work anyway, whether it's the result of a reading, a signing, a talk, or an edit. Much of my effort is uncompensated (or poorly compensated) monetarily. When fair pay becomes important, I'll get a job.


You can find out more about Bob Sanchez -- and When Pigs Fly -- at the link above, or via his blog.

Wednesday, July 4, 2007

Independence Day

by Thomas Jefferson
with the incorporated thoughts of John Adams and Benjamin Franklin

IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776.
THE UNANIMOUS
DECLARATION
OF THE
THIRTEEN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA.

WHEN, in the Course of human Events, it becomes necessary for one People to dissolve the Political Bands which have connected them with another, and to assume, among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's GOD entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the Causes which impel them to the Separation.

We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed, by their CREATOR, with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these Rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its Foundation on such Principles, and organizing its Powers in such Form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate, that Governments long established, should not be changed for light and transient Causes; and accordingly all Experience hath shewn, that Mankind are more disposed to suffer, while Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object, evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security. Such has been the patient Sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the Necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The History of the present King of Great-Britain is a History of repeated Injuries and Usurpations, all having in direct Object the Establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid World.

HE has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public Good.

HE has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing Importance, unless suspended in their Operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

HE has refused to pass other Laws for the Accommodation of large Districts of People, unless those People would relinquish the Right of Representation in the Legislature, a Right inestimable to them, and formidable to Tyranny only.

HE has called together Legislative Bodies at Places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the Depository of their public Records, for the sole Purpose of fatiguing them into Compliance with his Measures.

HE has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly Firmness his Invasions on the Rights of the People.

HE has refused for a long Time, after such Dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining, in the mean Time, exposed to all the Dangers of Invasion from without, and Convulsions within.

HE has endeavoured to prevent the Population of these States; for that Purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their Migrations hither, and raising the Conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

HE has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers.

HE has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the Tenure of their Offices, and the Amount and Payment of their Salaries.

HE has erected a Multitude of new Offices, and sent hither Swarms of Officers to harrass our People, and eat out their Substance.

HE has kept among us, in Times of Peace, Standing Armies, without the Consent of our Legislatures.

HE has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power.

HE has combined with others to subject us to a Jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution, and unacknowledged by our Laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

FOR quartering large Bodies of Armed Troops among us:

FOR protecting them, by a mock Trial, from Punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

FOR cutting off our Trade with all Parts of the World:

FOR imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

FOR depriving us, in many Cases, of the Benefits of Trial by Jury:

FOR transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended Offences:

FOR abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an arbitrary Government, and enlarging its Boundaries, so as to render it at once an Example and fit Instrument for introducing the same absolute Rule into these Colonies:

FOR taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

FOR suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with Power to legislate for us in all Cases whatsoever.

HE has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection, and waging War against us.

HE has plundered our Seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our Towns, and destroyed the Lives of our People.

HE is, at this Time, transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to complete the Works of Death, Desolation, and Tyranny, already begun with Circumstances of Cruelty and Perfidy, scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous Ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized Nation.

HE has constrained our Fellow-Citizens, taken Captive on the high Seas, to bear Arms against their Country, to become the Executioners of their Friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

HE has excited domestic Insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the Inhabitants of our Frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known Rule of Warfare, is an undistinguished Destruction, of all Ages, Sexes, and Conditions.

IN every Stage of these Oppressions we have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble Terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated Injury. A Prince, whose Character is thus marked by every Act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the Ruler of a free People.

NOR have we been wanting in Attentions to our British Brethren. We have warned them, from Time to Time, of Attempts by their Legislature to extend an unwarrantable Jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the Circumstances of our Emigration and Settlement here. We have appealed to their native Justice and Magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the Ties of our common Kindred to disavow these Usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our Connexions and Correspondence. They too have been deaf to the Voice of Justice and of Consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the Necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the Rest of Mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

WE, therefore, the Representatives of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, in GENERAL CONGRESS Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the World for the Rectitude of our Intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly Publish and Declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be, FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES; that they are absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political Connexion between them and the State of Great-Britain, is, and ought to be, totally dissolved; and that as FREE AND INDEPENDENT STATES, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which INDEPENDENT STATES may of Right do. And for the Support of this Declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of DIVINE PROVIDENCE, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honour.


Wednesday, June 6, 2007

D-Day, Plus 63 Years

I didn't remember until I opened the newspaper that today is the 63rd anniversary of D-Day.

I should have remembered. Yesterday I did a critique of a book review, one of a memoir written by a sergeant who jumped into France pre-D-Day and served (including the Battle of Bastogne) the entire war. He was the only member of his company not killed, wounded, or gone missing in action.

There are fewer and fewer of the old soldiers left. Time is accomplishing what Fascism could not. And when one of them tells a story like Jump Into the Valley of the Shadow: The World War II memoirs of a paratrooper in the 508th P.I.R., 82nd Airborne Division by Dwayne and Leland Burns we should treasure the chance to understand what it means -- the price paid -- for us to live free in a democracy.

I'm a history buff. I'm fascinated by ... well, by the "cusps of history," moments when, for good or ill, the course of humankind's history lay at stake. D-Day is one of those moments, and it's success owed to many (those who faced the Nazi guns) and to one -- General Dwight D. Eisenhower, the man who made the decision and saw it through even though confusion and blunders and accidents washing up at his feet would have caused a lesser man to lose heart.

We write because we are human. We write because we are compelled to tell our stories to one another.

And, as a writer, I am frustrated with myself because I have let stories like the one included in paratrooper's memoir escape. My father served in the Philippines and on Okinawa. He is dead now. My uncle served as part of an aircrew "flying the hump" from India into China. He is dead now. A neighbor stormed the beach at Tarawa to clear traps meant to snag Marine landing craft. He is dead now. Those stories are gone forever.

As writers -- no, as readers and as citizens -- we have an obligation, I think, to seek out these stories, these tales of how we became who we are. The next one I encounter -- not yet voiced, waiting within the hard-held memories of a hard-used old man -- I will record.

Tuesday, May 29, 2007

Miss Snark

If you're a regular reader of the IWW Blog, you're aware no doubt one of the first RSS feeds from another writing blog was that to Miss Snark, the anonymous persona reporting from deep in the bowels of the beast we call the publishing industry.

Miss Snark has retired.

Oddly enough, as important as this person appeared to be to writers-attempting-to-be-published-authors, if you write "Miss Snark" in the search mechanisms of The Washington Post or the New York Times, you find to results.

On the other hand, if you write "Miss Snark retires" in Google, you'll find laments by the score from bloggers and from e-publications like The AbsoluteWrite.

And this from a site supposed to have attracted 2,000,000 visitors! One would think Miss Snark could have turned that amount of traffic into an advertising bonanza.

I wish I understood all I know, and know all I think I know.

Sunday, May 27, 2007

A Week of Yahoos!

Lots of people scoring triumphs last week! Putting these in alphabetical order by last names seemed only fair. Next time I'll do it by first names.

Ruth Douillette:

T-zero Xpandizine-The Writer's E-Zine is an online e-zine focusing on writing. They published an essay of mine called: "Who Me? Blog? Seven Reasons Why You Should." They publish monthly, usually switching stories mid-month.


Lynn Edge:

My haibun, "Death in the RV Park," is up on Simply Haiku. You will have to click enter and scroll down to the haibun section. My photo is included with this one if anyone is interested. "Death in the RV Park" was critiqued by the poets on this list. Thanks to everyone.


Peg Frey:

Hi All!

Just rec'd a nod from the flashquake folks that my CNF piece, "Morning Deliveries," has been picked up for their summer issue. Should be available in early June and will run as an Editor's pick. Flashquake publishes fiction, nonfiction and poetry and has published many of our members in the past. This is my third appearance. A 1000-word maximum is required on submissions; a modest stipend is paid on publication.

I also had a piece selected and I guess published [rec'd the check when I returned home] for Cup of Comfort's Classic Essay edition. This was a very quick turn over, a call for submissions with a 3-week deadline. I had the essay on file, "Holding your Breath," and the editor Colleen Sell picked it up. She also did a splendid editing job. The Cup of Comfort series has been running for several years. They normally have targeted titles similar to the Chicken Soup folks. They pay $100 per piece with a $500 bump on lead essays. Again, a number of members have published with COC.

You can check out manuscript particulars at: http://www.cupofcomfort.com/share.htm

Both pieces garnered comments/suggestions on the nonfiction and practice boards. So, thanks for the help and continuing encouragement!


Alan Girling:

A pulp fiction website, Demolition Magazine (2007 Gumshoe Award Winner for Best Crime Fiction Website), has just published my story, "Cake." If you don't mind reading about nasty people doing nasty things, take a look at it. Or be warned.

Wendee Holtcamp

"Will Urban Sprawl K.O. The Koala? A wildlife hospital founded by the late 'Crocodile Hunter' Steve Irwin is helping Australia's teddy-bearish marsupial weather the threat of fragmented forest habitat." National Wildlife Magazine, Jun/July 2007 World Edition.

Thanks!


Kristen Howe:

Associated Content has accepted my article, "From Creation to Cancellation: Why Good Shows Get Canceled? (part 1)," since Constant-Content rejected it twice, the original and the revision. I got an offer of $4.23. Since no one critted it, I'll let you know when it's up. I hope to get parts 2-3 up there too shortly. Stay tuned.


Louisa Howerow:

I have a short fiction piece up in Night Train called "The Crossing." It started as a Practice piece (about two years ago). Thank you to the members for their critiques. The exercise prompts and the feedback are wonderful!

Night Train publishes fiction and poetry. They used to be a print magazine; they weren't able to make a go of it with the last issue. It will now be on-line.


Robert Hyers:

Yahoo! My non-fiction piece "Return To Neverland." The query was critted on the n-f list, is now up. Thank you guys so much!

And a special shout out to Dawn Goldsmith, who I hope is getting out of her slump. She's a fantastic writer and human being. She gave me the confidence to try something new and patiently guided me through my first query process. Thanks, Dawn!


Steven Maus:

Associated Content bought my short story "The Drill Press!' It is the first ever piece of writing that I have sold, so I'm very excited. Go on over and have a read.


Bob Sanchez:

On Point, the Army's journal of military history, liked my review of Where are the WMDs? and will publish it in their next issue. Many thanks to folks on this list who offered their comments. You helped a lot!


Wayne Scheer:

File this one under You Never Know...

For a long while now, I've often had a story or nonfiction essay (sometimes both) published in flashquake each quarter, a real source of pride. This time, I sent them a story and an essay I thought were good, and at the last minute, I sent them my only published poem, "Cousin Harold," since they accept reprints. Despite my dreams of winning the Triple Crown, the story and essay were rejected but the poem will be up in June. You never know. I'll be joining Peg Frey; that's good company. My short story, "Buddies," will be published in Skive Magazine, also in June. Skive is usually a print magazine, but this issue will be sold as an ezine.

Thanks to Fiction for critiquing "Buddies." Thanks also to Practice for forcing me to try my hand at writing a poem. This is a great group.

I'm about to leave for a two-week vacation, but I got a nice going away gift from Conceit Magazine, a print publication. They published an old essay of mine, "My War Story," in their May issue. Since I sent it to them months ago they certainly were late in notifying me, but that's all right. As usual, thanks for all your help. I'll miss you as I'm cruising the Baltic...but not that much.


Joanna M. Weston:

Four poems published: 'Movement', 'The nine ways of Lisa', 'Causality', and 'Old music new' in Myth Weavers: Canadian myths and legends, edited by Katherine L. Gordon, published by Serengeti Press. The poems were all critiqued on the list - many thanks to you all.

Friday, May 25, 2007

The Writing Life

Thursday afternoon in the local B&N (Pru Center, Boston, the biggest mall in New England), I had a chance to chat with William Martin, author of several well-received historical novels and historical thrillers. One of his books was on the New York Times bestseller list for several weeks a few years ago, and one was made into a movie.

Accompanied on his left by a delightful chubby young woman I never got to know and on his right by his son, a six-foot bruiser who smiled a lot, Martin stood just inside the door of this huge store behind a little stand, surrounded by copies of his latest, The Lost Constitution. He'd been there something over an hour, and was signing books to leave behind. Nobody was bothering him, so I struck up a conversation.

With my usual plethora of wit, I said something like, "You wrote Annapolis, didn't you?"

He said yes, and then told me a story about getting to go there in a submarine when he was doing research for the book. Then I told him I'd read Back Bay, his first book, some time ago, and he seemed pleased. (I used seemed there because for all I know he couldn't have cared less and was bored stupid by the whole event.) I then said I would read his new one when the paperback came out, and he and his entourage laughed.

I asked who his favorite historical novelist is, not counting himself, of course, and he chose E. L. Doctorow. Then I asked what he thought about the demise of newspaper book sections, and the general decline in the number of reviews written. He was sorry about that -- he needs all the publicity he can get. I wished him luck, and then wandered off. Ten minutes later, and still no one was coming up to buy an autographed copy, so I went back, introduced myself, and bought one, which he kindly signed with a personal comment. Nice fellow. Probably a pretty good novel.

I didn't ask him how he felt about book signings where nobody wants a book signed, because I'm a nice guy. A year or so ago Janet Evanovich had a crowd around her table the whole time, and a few weeks ago somebody named Rachael Ray, of whom I had never heard (still haven't), jammed the corridors of the mall for a hundred feet around. My feeling was that being a mid-list author, even one who has won literary awards, must have its downside. I hope he does better at Wal-Mart.

How I Found the IWW: Or, "Thanks, Max Barry!"

  • I read about your website from a writer who wrote an article on the website called: Reporter.co.za.
  • I found this site on The Purple Crayon website.
  • I found you with a search on Google, I believe.
  • I heard about IWW through the author site/blog of Australian writer Max Barry.
  • I found the site when I was looking for academic writing sites on Google.
  • Max Barry. I don't usually go to book readings/author sightings, but I made an exception for Max.
  • I found your website via a Yahoo search.
  • Your site was recommended to me by a member of a support group I attend.
  • My group leader gave me the url of your workshop and said she had referred others to it who had found it welcoming, although I don't believe she herself is a member.
  • Using Goodsearch.com
  • I found the IWW from a link by reading the group's blog.
  • I heard about you on forwriters.com.

Wednesday, May 23, 2007

Constructing Our Own Narrative

Each time I access the Web, each time I remember that the Internet Writing Workshop has participants from the US, Canada, South America, Australia, Great Britain, South Africa, India, and assorted other places, I think about the English language, its influence on the world community, and the effect on culture point-of-view in fiction and nonfiction.

There was recently an interesting article (at least to me as an admirer of creative nonfiction) in the New York Times -- "This Is Your Life (And How You Narrate It) -- that addresses the issue. The thesis, generally, is that "Researchers have found that the human brain has a natural affinity for narrative construction."

The studies discussed focused on research here in the United States, and it was noted that, "In broad outline, the researchers report, such tales express distinctly American cultural narratives, of emancipation or atonement, of Horatio Alger advancement, of epiphany and second chances."

If the tendency to think in narratives is universal -- which would mean the narrative dynamic of works like One Hundred Years of Solitude, War and Peace, and Kenzaburo's A Person Matter rests in the cultures of Colombia, Russia, and Japan -- there must be an underlying element within either the work itself or human nature that permits each of us to see ourselves in those diverse works.

Benedict Carey's article also focuses on how we perceive our self-constructed narratives depending on whether we relate them in the first or third person, which may be of more interest to fiction writers than those who write creative nonfiction.

It is a thoughtful piece exploring ramifications of the human pysche, and it is worthwhile read for any writer exploring the craft.

Tuesday, May 22, 2007

Grammar Mavens

IWW administrator and IWW Blog tender Carter Jefferson likes to rummage amongst the pages of various grammar texts, and he has a counterpart in the political columnist James J. Kilpatrick.

Carter speaks occasionally to the IWW's Writing list. Kilpatrick's column can be found, among other places, on Yahoo's Opinion page.

Mr. Kilpatrick corrected me when he opened a session of his Court of Peeves, Crotchets & Irks. My own was the use of the word ensure. I believed that ensure existed merely as the lifted pinky on the tea cup of language. I complained to Kilpatrick the word had no value other than pretension, that any instance where a person might be eager to use ensure when either insure or assure would be a better fit.

Here is Kilpatrick's reply ...

Many thanks for your inquiry about "insure" and "ensure." I've written about the distinction a couple of times, but perhaps not lately. In many contexts the distinction is too slim to bother with. Strictly speaking, we ought to reserve "insure" for purely financial contexts. We insure against loss. We sign up for the derivative noun "insurance." We buy life "insurance" policies that pay off in money. For everything else, the better choice is probably "ensure." Their marriage began well, "But his heavy drinking soon ensured its collapse."

If you run across interesting examples of doubtful usage, please pass along the dated citations.

Cordially James J. Kilpatrick.


I was certain ensure existed simply to allow Emily Post and Henry James to avoid writing about the mercantile classes, but I was wrong.

I'm often wrong. Sometimes for years. Or decades. As when I reversed the references of "each other" and "one another."